Yes, Joe Scarborough, and thanks for asking! The answer is YES!Anyone who tries to make a credible argument to the contrary is, at this point in the accumulated weight of the evidence, merely spitting into the wind.
Sure there are still a few who try to argue that Bush is just playing dumb in order to create plausible deniability against accusations of devious criminal intent. But if that were true, he would only need to seem so dumb. If he were smart enough to know better, he would certainly stop short of seeming criminally and dangerously ignorant!
No, every time he opens his mouth, Bush falls deeper into his own spider hole of shame, where his legacy will be the scorn and ridicule of future generations who will have to pay the price for his blundering negligence.
So to answer the question once more Mr. Scarborough - yes, yes, a thousand times, YES!!!!
Oh God YES!
ReplyDeleteCheck out Thomas Friedman's column today. When Tom changes his allegiances, he REALLY switches sides. He hammers the administration over what he has (finally!) decided is an un-serious approach to terrorism and Iraq (which he treats as 2 separate issues, further illustrating his abandonment of Bushco). But what I really found interesting was the fact that he directs nearly all of his ire against Deadeye Dick Cheney. I think Tommy Boy knows who the brains of the operation is (such brains as there are).
I'm surprised there are any left in the nation for whom this could have remained an open question.
ReplyDeleteAccording to
www.co.tom-green.tx.us/datty/LegalTerms.htm
(I thought using Texas a neat touch here), felony is defined as:
A crime of a graver or more atrocious nature than those designated as misdemeanors. Generally an offense punishable by death or imprisonment in penitentiary.
Felonious stupidity should fall within that definition. Ordinarily I'm opposed to the death penalty...but I suppose I could be more readily persuaded in this case than in any other.